| WORLD WILDLIFE FUND
(WWF)-AMERICAN RED CROSS (ARC) PARTNERSHIP ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL ADVISORY
SERVICES ASSESSMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Indonesia American
Red Cross |
|
|
|
Number of Resondents: |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade |
% SA and above |
| 7. The goal and
objectives of the Partnership that were developed at the programÕs inception
are still valid today. |
77.8% |
66.7% |
| Strongly Agree |
1 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 8. The Partnership
goal and objectives are important to achieving my organizationÕs goals and
objectives. |
44.4% |
33.3% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9. Environmental
sustainability is a priority for the American Red Cross Tsunami Recovery
Program. |
66.7% |
66.7% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
2 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10. Humanitarian aid
programming is a priority for WWF. |
44.4% |
0.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
2 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11. The activities
that have been planned to realize the PartnershipÕs goal and objectives are
the most appropriate. |
38.9% |
33.3% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12. The PartnershipÕs
goal and objectives are well understood by both partners. |
38.9% |
33.3% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 13. Roles and
responsibilities of both partners are well defined, appropriate, and
understood by the staff of both organizations. |
27.8% |
0.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
2 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 14. ARC has a
demonstrated commitment to the Partnership. |
55.6% |
66.7% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
2 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 15. WWF has a
demonstrated commitment to the Partnership. |
66.7% |
100.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
3 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16. The Partnership
structure enables ARC to utilize its institutional strengths. |
50.0% |
33.3% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 17. The Partnership
structure enables WWF to utilize its institutional strengths. |
33.3% |
0.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 18. Operational
working relationships between ARC and WWF in the Partnership are generally
effective. |
38.9% |
0.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
2 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 19. The current
management structure of the Partnership is able to address issues arising
between the partners in a timely, effective manner. |
55.6% |
33.3% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 20. Technical
proposal reviews conducted by WWF are carried out in a timely, professional,
and efficient manner. |
88.9% |
100.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
1 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
2 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 21. Training from WWF
to ARC and ARC grantees enhances project implementation and accomplishment. |
72.2% |
100.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
2 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 22. WWF makes
contributions to other ARC- sponsored meetings, workshops, and events. |
66.7% |
100.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
3 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 23. WWF personnel are
readily available to ARC for rapid consultation. |
61.1% |
66.7% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 24. ARC provides WWF
with useful feedback on the quality and usefulness of WWFÕs proposal reviews. |
61.1% |
66.7% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
2 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 25. ARC facilitates
the co-location of WWF staff in its offices. |
72.2% |
66.7% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
2 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 26. ARC uses the
information provided by WWF to improve the environmental sustainability of
projects being implemented. |
61.1% |
33.3% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
2 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| *Note: questions 27 - 33 were asked to WWF & IUCN employees only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 27. There are clear
lines of communication among the different members of the HP team.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 28. There are clear
lines of communication between our WWF/IUCN team and the ARC.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 29. There is a clear
protocol for raising management issues.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 30. HP team members
are clear about whom to consult when management issues arise.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 31. The structure of
the HP team enables workflow to be well distributed among team members.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 32. There is a clear
work plan in place linked to achievement of Partnership goals and
objectives.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 33. A clear protocol
exists for resolving issues that arise in the course of work with the ARC.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| **Note: questions 34 & 35 were asked to ARC employees only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 34. There are clear
lines of communication between the ARC and WWF/IUCN.** |
50.0% |
33.3% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 35. There is a clear
protocol for raising and resolving issues that arise in the course of work
with the WWF/IUCN.** |
50.0% |
33.3% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 36. As necessary, the
PartnershipÕs regional support system addresses management issues confronting
country-level partners in a timely, effective manner. |
72.2% |
66.7% |
| Strongly Agree |
1 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 37. The PartnershipÕs
regional support system provides resources and assistance in the development
of country-level work plans that are linked to achievement of Partnership
goals and objectives. |
77.8% |
100.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
1 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
2 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 38. Communication
among team members and the Partnership as a whole is supported by clear
protocols on information flow. |
61.1% |
66.7% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
2 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 39. Communication
between team members is supported by adequate technologies, enabling
communication between local and geographically-dispersed team members. |
58.3% |
50.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
1 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| *Note: questions 40 - 44 were asked to WWF & IUCN employees only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40. Procedures are in
place to facilitate timely recruitment of appropriately-qualified staff and
have been employed for the project.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 41. Salaries and
benefits are adequate to attract and retain staff with required technical
skills.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 42. Staff job
descriptions are linked to Partnership goals and objectives.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 43. Current team
members have the requisite skills needed to fulfill their job roles and
responsibilities.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 44. There is a staff
development plan in place linked to identified skills needs.* |
N/A |
N/A |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 45. Current team
members have the requisite skills to meet the technical needs of the ARC. |
38.9% |
0.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
2 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 46. The goal and
objectives of the Partnership have been well communicated to relevant team
members in my organization. |
50.0% |
50.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
1 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
0 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
1 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 47. Active leadership
is being provided by my organization to communicate the vision and realize
the goal and objectives of the Partnership. |
50.0% |
0.0% |
| Strongly Agree |
0 |
|
|
| Mostly Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Agree |
0 |
|
| Somewhat Disagree |
3 |
|
| Mostly Disagree |
0 |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
